Whirlpool 6AWM5100

3 evaluaciones

Nov 2024

Visión General
Comparación de Precios

alaTest ha recogido y analizado 3 comentarios relacionados al producto Whirlpool 6AWM5100. En promedio, la calificación para este producto es 3.7/5, al ser comparado con la calificación 4.3/5 de otros productos en la categoria productos.

En promedio, los usuarios valoran este producto en 73/100.

Analisis de Comentarios

(Basado en 3 comentarios)

Evaluaciones de los usuarios

Descargo de responsabilidad:

A continuación se muestra una lista de las revisiones para este producto o similares. Si usted piensa que esta agrupación es incorrecto por favor haga clic aquí para la bandera.
Lea más en nuestra FAQ’s página.

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3 Mostrar Evaluaciones: En español | Todas las evaluaciones

Comentario de Usuario (productreview.com.au)

Perfect washing machine.

I have owned this machine since 2002 and it has never missed a beat! The drive belt snapped a couple of days ago; not bad after 11 plus years of constant use. Chasing around for a new belt now. It cleans clothes brilliantly, runs smoothly and I would...

Everything - low water consumption, energy efficient and amazingly clean clothes

Ago 2013

Leer Evaluacion completa

Comentario de Usuario (productreview.com.au)

Bad

Mine has died after 6 years. A screw came loose in the back and jammed up the drum!! I would have like to have a few more years service.

Good with clothes, keeping colour / shape

Cant open the door for a whole minute after its started cycle. Writing smudges on face of machine. Its f&*%n heavy

Feb 2008

Leer Evaluacion completa

Comentario de Usuario (productreview.com.au)

Good

I was told when I was thinking about purchasing a front loader that it is 'so much better on your clothes', and I though, really? I would never have believed it but it's so true! Your clothes come out soft and delicate. It has a AAAA water conservation...

Uses much less water, gentle on clothes, easy to use, start delay function .

Can't open door once cycle has started, cycles are soooooo long (1 hr 15 min even on eco rapid function!)

Jul 2007

Leer Evaluacion completa